Lecture Notes on Noncorrespondence 15-816: Modal Logic

نویسنده

  • André Platzer
چکیده

In lecture 7, we have seen how axiomatics and semantics of modal logic fit together in soundness proofs and correspondence proofs. We have seen several examples of classes of Kripke frames that are characterized by formulas of propositional modal logic. These were several special cases. But we are looking for a general correspondence result. Can we find a full correspondence result? For any formula of propositional modal logic, associate a class of Kripke frames that it characterizes? And for any class of Kripke frames, associate a formula of propositional modal logic that characterizes it? Certainly not! Even for Kripke frames with countable sets of worlds, classes of Kripke frames are not countable, and cannot possibly be matched with the countable set of formulas. Let us try a more modest general correspondence between propositional modal logic and first-order definable classes of Kripke frames. For any class of Kripke frames given by a first-order formula on the frame, associate a formula of propositional modal logic that characterizes it? And for any formula of propositional modal logic, associate a class of Kripke frames—defined by a formula in first-order logic—that it characterizes? It turns out that even that is impossible!

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Lecture Notes on Soundness and Correspondence 15-816: Modal Logic

In the lecture 5 we have followed an axiomatic and a semantic approach to modal logic. But do these approaches fit together? We should not be using proof rules that make no sense semantically. Recall the axioms and proof rules we had so far Figure 1. The proof rules are sound iff they can only derive semantical consequences. Note that, unlike in the first lectures, this is an external soundness...

متن کامل

Lecture Notes on Completeness and Canonical Models 15-816: Modal Logic

In this lecture we consider a logic as the set of its tautologies. The following definition captures the closure properties that the we expect from this set of tautologies: Definition 1 (Normal modal logic) A set L of formulas is called a normal modal logic if: 1. L contains all propositional tautologies 2. (p→ q)→ ( p→ q) ∈ L for all propositional letters p, q 3. A ∈ L, (A→ B) ∈ L implies B ∈ ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010